hdr_home (36K)
  HOME COLLECTION EDUCATION IMAGE GALLERY SOUTH FLORIDA ORGANIZATIONS MEETINGS STAFF
  SHARK TROPICAL
RESEARCH
FRESHWATER
RESEARCH
BIOLOGICAL
PROFILES
JUST FOR KIDS IN THE NEWS SITE LINKS FLMNH

IUCN/SSG logo

The IUCN/SSC Shark Specialist Group

Shark News 14: March 2002

Lake Nicaragua revisited: conversations with a former sawfish fisherman
Matthew T. McDavitt
Diversity
In a series of articles spanning more than a decade, the late Dr. Thomas Thorson chronicled the catastrophic decline of sawfish populations in Lake Nicaragua. During his pioneering tagging study of bull shark movements into the Rio San Juan-Lake Nicaragua system in 1966, he discovered that largetooth sawfishes (Pristis perotteti) were remarkably abundant in the lake. In 1970, the Nicaraguan government encouraged the development of a targeted fishery to exploit the lake's rich elasmobranch resources. Two companies and a processing plant were established in Granada, a town in the northwest corner of the lake. By 1975, an estimated 60,000 - 100,000 sawfishes had been harvested (Thorson 1976). The meat was consumed domestically and exported overseas; dried fins were marketed to the lucrative Chinese shark-fin trade (Thorson 1982a).

By 1973, Dr. Thorson sounded the alarm that sawfish populations were reaching critical levels, and that immediate action was required to forestall the impending crash of the sawfish fishery (Thorson 1982a). His recommendations went unheeded, and in the 1980's the industry collapsed, and fishermen refused to target the now elusive sawfishes. Faced with the reality that the once abundant sawfishes were now functionally extirpated from the lake, the Nicaraguan government instituted a temporary moratorium on targeted fishing for sawfishes and sharks (Thorson 1982a). They hoped this would allow the sawfishes time to replenish their stocks, beginning the slow process of reestablishing healthy populations in the lake. Political upheaval in Nicaragua during the 1980's precluded any reassessment studies of sawfish populations in the lake. It remained unclear whether the ban on targeting sawfishes had been effective. Had the sawfishes returned to Lake Nicaragua?

A new survey
In the summer of 1998, I visited Lake Nicaragua to assist with a preliminary survey of shark and sawfish populations initiated by Dr. William Raschi. Guided by former shark fishermen who knew the best locations to find these elasmobranchs, we set a series of longlines totalling 5,500 meters at depths ranging from 2.4m - 37.8m. We had also planned to set a series of gillnets, but our net vanished the first night it was set. No sharks or sawfishes were caught during the brief survey. Conversations with local fishermen confirmed that sawfish and shark populations have not recovered from the devastating over-harvest two decades ago.

Interview on Ometepe
With the assistance of Alvaro Molina of the Estación Biológica de Ometepe, I interviewed a fisherman who had participated in the sawfish fishery. Eduardo entered the industry near the end of the sawfish fishery; of particular interest are his assertions that he caught substantial numbers of sawfishes during the 1980's, the decade when the fishery collapsed and the temporary moratorium was eventually enacted.

Q: What is your full name and occupation?
A: Eduardo Lanuza Diaz, fisherman.
Q: When did you become a professional shark fisherman?
A: In 1980, now I fish for tarpon (Tarpon atlanticus) and alligator gar (Lepisosteus tropicus).
Q: How many sawfishes have you caught during your career?
A: During the 1980's I caught between 150 and 250 sawfishes per week, fishing exclusively for sawfishes. There were three other boats doing the same.
Q: Where in the lake can sawfishes be found today?
A: Between Ometepe Island (Maderas volcano side) and Zanate Island, which is the deepest part of the lake.
Q: At what depth do you usually find sawfishes, and on what kind of substrate?
A: 40 meters in depth, mostly on muddy bottoms.
Q: What type of gear do you use to catch sawfishes?
A: With gillnets laid out on the bottom of the lake.
Q: How many sawfishes are accidentally caught in your nets per year now (1998)?
A: Between four and six sawfishes per year.
Q: Do you know anyone who has been injured catching sawfishes?
A: The animal can be very aggressive and has to be killed before it can be handled. Sometimes they have to drag it to shore to kill it. Injuries can occur when you drag it along the boat to kill it.
Q: If a sawfish gets caught in your nets, how do you kill it?
A: By hitting it on the head with a baseball bat type instrument.
Q: What do the sawfishes eat?
A: They eat small fishes at the bottom, the same kinds you caught (cichlids). When sawfishes are in heat, they come to the surface to mate.
Q: Where can baby sawfishes be found in the lake?
A: In very shallow areas around Ometepe and Zanate Islands.
Q: How do you cure a sawfish snout?
A: Hang them from a tree to dry and the cut end is cured with salt.
Q: Do you think the ban on sawfish fishing has helped?
A: The population has not recovered from the overkill of the 1980's.


Conclusions
Lake Nicaragua is perhaps unique in the world. Nowhere else have sawfishes been recorded in such densities (Thorson 1982a), the population is even more remarkable because it exists in a lake. Dr. Raschi's brief longline survey, in agreement with the opinions of local fisherman, suggests that the government ban on targeted fishing for sawfishes and sharks has been ineffective. While no longer subject to focused harvest, sawfishes continue to be killed in gillnets set for other species. This incidental capture has seemingly prevented any meaningful recovery of elasmobranch populations in Lake Nicaragua. Unless substantial changes are made to current fishing policy, it is doubtful that sawfishes will ever return to their former abundance in the lake.

These observations are supported by examples of sawfish population declines elsewhere in the world. Freshwater sawfishes (Pristis microdon) were decimated in Lake Sentani, West Papua, Indonesia, by incidental gillnet capture alone. In Florida, populations of smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) are just now showing signs of slowing decline, only after gillnet fishing had been eliminated from state waters for several decades (Colin Simpfendorfer, pers. comm.). Sawfish populations are extremely sensitive to intensive gillnetting, regardless of the species targeted. This factor must be considered carefully whenever habitat is set aside for endangered sawfishes.

References
Thorson, T.B. 1976. Observations on the reproduction of the sawfish, Pristis perotteti, in Lake Nicaragua, with recommendations for its conservation. In: T.B. Thorson (ed.). Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes, pp. 641-650. Lincoln: School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Thorson, T.B. 1980. La explotacion excesiva del pez sierra, Pristis perotteti, en el Lago Nicaragua. ConCienca 7(1):11-13.

Thorson, T.B. 1982a. The impact of commercial exploitation on sawfish and shark populations in Lake Nicaragua. Fisheries 7(2):2- 10.

Thorson, T.B. 1982b. Life history implications of a tagging study of the sawfish, Pristis perotteti, in the Lake Nicaragua-Rio San Juan system. Environmental Biology of Fishes 7(3):207-228.

Matthew McDavitt
6342 Hawthorne Terrace, Norcross, GA 30092, USA
Email: nokogiri@aol.com