hdr_home (36K)
  HOME COLLECTION EDUCATION IMAGE GALLERY SOUTH FLORIDA ORGANIZATIONS MEETINGS STAFF
  SHARK TROPICAL
RESEARCH
FRESHWATER
RESEARCH
BIOLOGICAL
PROFILES
JUST FOR KIDS IN THE NEWS SITE LINKS FLMNH

IUCN/SSG logo

The IUCN/SSC Shark Specialist Group

Shark News 7: June 1996

Population genetics: an accessory to tagging studies
Ed Heist, Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M University
Many species of sharks span vast geographic ranges but may be divided into isolated breeding populations. If conservation efforts are to succeed, these individual populations need to be identified so that we can determine whether locally-depleted regions can be replenished from other areas. One way to do this is to examine movements of individual sharks through traditional tag and recapture. Another, more recent, technique involves analysis of population genetics using polymorphic characters. The purpose of this article is to discuss the relationship between traditional tagging and genetic studies, and to demonstrate how both kinds of research can add to our understanding of shark populations.

While tagging studies detect movements of individuals within a single lifetime, genetic studies track movements of genes over many generations. When two populations become isolated reproductively, gene frequencies change over generations through random genetic drift. Ultimately isolated populations become fixed for alternate alleles; for many generations however only frequency differences will exist. Reproduction between individuals from different regions results in gene flow, homogenising gene frequencies between regions. By examining frequencies of polymorphic genes from different geographic regions we can estimate the amount of gene flow that has taken place over past generations.

Both techniques, tagging and population genetics, have strengths and weaknesses. Genetic homogeneity between regions is not proof that separate fishery stocks do not exist: populations may not have been isolated long enough for differences in allele frequencies to develop; or an exchange of only a few individuals per generation is sufficient to maintain the same alleles in different populations. Tagging studies may thus reveal significant stock structure in the absence of any genetic structure. On the other hand, genetic studies may reveal details about reproductive life-histories of organisms not detectable by tagging studies. Some marine organisms, sea turtles and whales for example, have separate breeding populations that overlap during part of the year. Studies in these organisms have revealed significant population structure despite the fact that individuals from separate breeding units intermingle. Many species of sharks deliver their pups in coastal nursery areas distant from the locations where adults are usually found. Genetic studies may tell us whether female sharks return to the same nursery area from which they came, and therefore whether local depletion of juvenile sharks in a coastal nursery area will have a long-term effect on future generations of pups.

Population genetic studies have been published on sandbar sharks in the US and on the gummy shark, spot-tail shark, and Australian blacktip shark in Australia. Other projects under way include studies on the great white and whale shark. Recently, John Graves, Jack Musick and I published a paper on population genetics in the shortfin mako (Heist et al. 1996). We examined mitochondrial DNA genotype frequencies in makos from the North Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Pacific and South Pacific. We found there was a highly significant difference in genotype frequency between the North Atlantic and other samples, suggesting little or no exchange of makos between the North Atlantic and other oceans. This finding is also consistent with the tagging data of Casey et al. (1992) that shows long-distance movement of tagged makos within the North Atlantic, but no recaptures south of the equator or in other oceans. Both population genetics and tagging can thus provide important information for the conservation of shark populations.

References

Casey, J.G., and Kohler, N.E. 1992. Tagging studies on the shortfin mako shark ( Isurus oxyrinchus) in the western North Atlantic. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 43: 45-60.

Heist, E.J., Musick, J.A., and Graves, J.E. 1996. Genetic population structure of the shortfin mako ( Isurus oxyrinchus) inferred from restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 583-588.

Ed Heist, Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M
University, USA. Email: e-heist@tamu.edu