Hinchliff, C. E., S. A. Smith, J. F. Allman, J. G. Burleigh, R. Chaudhary, L. M. Coghill, K. A. Crandall, J. Deng, B. T. Drew, R. Gazis, K. Gude, D. S. Hibbett, L. A. Katz, H. D. Laughinghouse, E. J. McTavish, P. E. Midford, C. L. Owen, R. H. Ree, J. A. Rees, D. E. Soltis, T. Williams, and K. A. Cranston. 2015. Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life. PNAS 201423041. [View article on publisher’s site]
Wolf, P. G., E. B. Sessa, D. B. Marchant, F.-W. Li, C. J. Rothfels, E. M. Sigel, M. A. Gitzendanner, C. J. Visger, J. A. Banks, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, K. M. Pryer, and J. P. Der. 2015. An Exploration into Fern Genome Space. Genome Biol Evol 7:2533–2544. [View abstract on publisher’s site]
Here’s a photo a good portion of the lab. It was taken at a start of the year party at Pam and Doug’s.
Ryan Folk, who happens to be a new post-doc in the lab, and Patrick Alexander have named a new species of Heuchera in honor of Doug: Heuchera soltisii.
Folk, R. A., and P. J. Alexander. 2015. Two New Species, Heuchera soltisii and H. inconstans, with Further Taxonomic Notes for the Western Group of Heuchera Section Heuchera (Saxifragaceae). Systematic Botany 489–500. [View on publisher’s site]
“Etymology—This species is named for Douglas Edward Soltis, who, in addition to his early biosystematic work on Sullivantia Torr. & Gray and the Heuchera group of genera, contributed the earliest molecular-systematic studies on saxifrages, greatly improving our understanding of their natural relationships and providing molecular evidence on the importance of hybridization in their history.”
Douglas E. Soltis, María Claudia Segovia-Salcedo, Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Lucas C. Majure, Nicolas M. Miles, Evgeny V. Mavrodiev, Wenbin Mei, Mark E. Mort, Pamela S. Soltis, Graham R. Jones, Thomas Marcussen, Bengt Oxelman, and Matthew A. Gitzendanner. The fate of polyploid lineages: A response to Mayrose et al. (2014). Online at: http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/museum-voices/soltis-lab/2015/07/29/the-fate-of-po…ose-et-al-2014/
Mayrose et al. (2011) and Arrigo and Barker (2012) concluded that neopolyploid lineages diversify more slowly than the diploid lineages from which they arise. We expressed concerns about this statement in Soltis et al. (2014a) to which Mayrose et al. (2014) responded. This article continues the discussion. We demonstrate a statistical problem with the original analysis which has not been discussed before. We point out that restricting to cpDNA data does not resolve the reticulation issue, contrary to Mayrose et al. (2014). Furthermore, we discuss some clade-specific problems with the data set used in the original analysis.
This happened a few months ago, but just now getting around to posting the photo. This was from the after run breakfast party.