| |
| |
| |
 |
|
|
 |
|

 |
Deep
Time Project, A Comprehensive Phylogenetic Tree of Living
and Fossil Angiosperms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments
and questions: Dr.
Doug Soltis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
© FLMNH. This site is maintained by the FLMNH.
Last
modified: 05/10/2002
|
|
|
New
Mexico Meeting
SUMMARY
OF FIRST DEEP TIME MEETING
HYATT HOTEL, ALBUQUERQUE, NM AUGUST 16, 2001
Summary
A key theme
of our initial discussions was the importance of coming up with something
solid, or concrete at the end of 5 years, rather than simply a series
of meetings. A major topic of discussion at this initial meeting was
the construction of an interactive website and construction of a comprehensive
morphological data base for angiosperm fossils; this data base could
be expanded to include living taxa. A format for construction of such
a web-accessed data base was developed; this concept is discussed
below. Although a comprehensive data base would be beyond the scope
of the Deep Time project itself, an initial effort would focus on
a list of "priority" fossils.
Opportunities
for funding were also discussed that would enable us to expand the
data base for fossils into a more comprehensive format. Also discussed
was the importance of using a small, well-defined clade of angiosperms
as "test case" for experimentation in construction of a data base,
as well as the issues involved in the integration of fossils into
a data set of extant taxa. More details from the meeting are provided
below.
Web site
- general
- It should
be interactive (readers will be able to offer comments on the taxa
and characters entered)
- General
editors and subeditors will be required for each group
- There
are several potential models (IPNI was mentioned; we may want to have
Deep Time participants attend the next meeting of this NSF funded
venture).
- Deep Time
should take a leading role to ensure that there is one, central data
basing project for angiosperms.
- There
are also several paleo-data basing projects and we will need to interact
with these groups (Richard Lupia may be able to take the lead on contacting
these groups)
Data
base project
- Should
be able to search by taxon or character; perhaps also by age and distribution
- Each
entry contains fossil illustration, information about the fossil that
is not readily available or apparent in the literature, a character
data base, and a phylogenetic tree indicating presumed or approximate
placement of the taxon Fossil Priority list
The need
for developing and placing on the web site (using the format noted
above) a group of priority fossils was discussed. What is meant by
a "priority" fossil was discussed. Priority fossils may involve more
than one organ, but only one organ may be suitable in some instances
(if it displays a particularly critical or diagnostic character).
Important fossils of the Lower Cretaceous were noted. Upper Cretaceous
fossils of interest to group members may also be included. Juglandaceae,
Fagales, particularly if these groups are to be used as initial models.
Ultimately, all good fossils would be considered. A lower priority
list could also be established --
- Name of
fossil
- Age range
(stratigraphy/years)
- Quality
· Where it occurs now, as well as paleo latitude and longitude
- key words,
descriptions
- Images
(that can be measured, as in the example of the Digital Dragonfly)
- Probable
relationships
- AnnotationÑother
interpretations? (Interactive)
- Other
information Morphological matrix for extant taxa
This
topic was discussed further by a group of participants over dinner
following our initial meeting. Walter Judd has compiled a summary
of this meeting, and this summary is provided below. Construction
of a Morphological Data Matrix (in connection with "Deep Time" project;
based on notes taken on August 16, 2001, in meeting of subgroup
interested in this issue):
Characters:
- Get group
of taxonomic experts together (including those familiar with particular
taxonomic groupsÑextinct and extantÑand pattern of variation within
particular characters).
- Decide
on potential characters to be assessed (based on a tentative list).At
this point detailed procedures for recording/measuring each character
would be determined, including the use of drawings/digital images.
The recording of morphological s.l. information would constitute the
metadata upon which an eventual data matrix (or matrices) would be
based. This data should be as "transparent" as possible, as it will
serve as the basis of subsequent decisions regarding state delimitation,
which may be various, depending upon taxonomic judgement and the scope
of later analyses. [These issues were much discussed, with some participants
in our meeting suggesting that character states could be determined
at this point, based on the experience of the taxonomic experts, while
others believed that such decisions should only be made after the
pattern of morphological variation was more thoroughly assessed.]
- At this
point, individuals would be assigned various taxa and/or characters
to observe and record, on an on-line database (which should have the
ability to include images/drawings). Actual recording of data from
specimens would take place at the individuals home institutions; some
loans of herbarium specimens likely would be required.
- Taxonomic
experts meet again to assess pattern of variation (i.e., review electronic
database or printed "data forms") and determine characters (and character
states) to be used in phylogenetic analyses. Criteria used in state
delimitation determined at this point. Coding decisions made at this
point. Evaluation of various characters, and some included in matrix,
others excluded.
- Construction
of matrix (see also issues relating to taxa).
The matrix
could be used in various ways, e.g., morphological phylogenetic
analysis, combined (molecular + morphological) analysis, mapping
morphological characters onto a molecular-based tree, etc.
Taxa:
- Species
used as terminals
- Whenever
possible, species that have served as the source of DNA data should
be used as the source of morphological s.l. data. [However, if a species
is considered by experts to be inappropriateÑdue to numerous morphological
specializationsÑa species better representing a higher taxon could
be suggested, and new sequences, etc. acquired.]
- Morphological
data from cited voucher specimens.
- Appropriate
taxon selection. Consult experts; higher taxa considered to be potentially
paraphyletic or polyphyletic would be more highly sampled than those
likely monophyletic.
- Fossils
to be include would be those most completely known, or with diagnostic
synapomorphies.
- Construct
morphological data matrix for selected species (see procedures under
characters).
Goals of
Project:
Goals need
to be clearly articulated. Some were suggested, as follows:
- Incorporate
fossils into phylogenies based on morphology, DNA, or combined data.
- Study
character change in connection with phylogenetic hypotheses.
- Construct
hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships based on morphological and
molecular data.
- Increase
confidence in taxonomic groupings (through assessment of congruence
of molecular and molecular phylogenies).
- Better
assess homology.
- Determine
morphological synapomorphies (of clades seen in various molecular
trees)
It
was noted that the goals will (in part) determine what kind of data
are needed. [Some discussion was given to the question of what would
be an appropriate "test case" on which to apply these methods. Various
taxa were discussed, including Fagales, Ranunculales, Ericales, Saxifragales,
Cornales, and Proteales. Criteria for taxon selection were also discussed.]
Other items available on the website
- Contact
appropriate individuals involved in the several paleo-data basing
projects so that we can better interact with these groups (Richard
Lupia) · Develop fossil "priority" list (Jim Doyle, David Taylor,
Pat Herendeen, David Dilcher)
- Find out
more about the IPNI next meeting (in Greece?) and make plans for a
group from Deep Time to attend (Peter Stevens) · Discuss possible
focus groups (Fagales? Juglandaceae? Ericales?)
- Invite
additional appropriate individuals to Feb meeting (e.g., Paul Manos)
· Initial development of website (Doug and Pam Soltis) · Estimated
time of divergence of major angiosperm clades (with help of S. Magallon)
- List of
fossil priority taxa (with help of Jim Doyle, David Taylor, Pat Herendeen,
David Dilcher)
- Discussion
of approach to be used in construction of morphological data base
for extant taxa (Judd, Stevens, Kron, et al.) · Approach NSF about
funding possibilties for a morphological data base project (Judd,
Soltis)
- Determine
possible sources of funding to develop support for a large fossil
data base project (Herendeen, Dilcher, others?)
- K-12 outreach
needed for BSA meetings in Madison, August, 2002 (P. Soltis, D. Soltis,
Dilcher, Herendeen)
- Advertise
phyhlogenetics workshops, short courses for students (Deep Time will
support several students per year) (P. Soltis, D. Soltis, Dilcher,
Herendeen)
- Ideas
for developing a possible paleobotany short course (Dilcher, Herendeen)
Deep
Time: Revised Agenda for First Meeting
8:30 Introductions of PIs and
other participants in the project
8:45 Have others attending introduce
themselves
9:00 Background on Deep Time and
the RCN program; mention Deep Gene
9:15 Goals of the project; discuss
four major research areas
9:30 Development of Deep Time
website; Virtual Fossil Project
9:45 Announce support available,
date for future meetings (particularly the proposed February meeting
in Florida, Feb. 22, 23, 2002)
10:00 Describe Groups and announce
group leaders (we will initially break up into groups specified by
goals) and allow people to decide group(s) they want to participate
in during the morning break
10:15 Break; Morning coffee
10:30 Groups begin to meet with
a group leader for each group
12:00 Box Lunch
1:00 Discuss integration of fossils
into the angiosperm tree and other aspects of the Deep Time project
as a single group
3:00 Break; Afternoon coffee,
coke, snacks
3:30 Meet with Deep Gene
5:00 End Discussions
7:00 Dinner with Deep Gene
|